If population pressure won't push human
beings out of the Solar System, and the pursuit of mineral wealth
won't carry us far (before compound interest overtakes us), our concern for species survival might still propel us across the galaxy. Last spring Stephen Hawking made a public statement in favor of interstellar exploration and colonization,
arguing that humans should not “keep all our eggs in one fragile
basket.” Without extrasolar colonies,
all of humanity could succumb to a local extinction-level
event like a gamma-ray burst or asteroid collision.
While I agree with Professor Hawking's
sentiment, I believe that finding a haven for humans and
other terrestrial species – I assume we'll want to save them too –
will prove quite difficult, and take much time and expense.
Extrasolar planets are more common than we used to think, but
terrestrial life forms will need water, Earthlike gravity (too much or too
little will fatally stress circulatory and skeletal systems), and a breathable atmosphere, conditions which we will only
find on a small minority of planets. The third condition poses the real
problem: free oxygen is rare without some sort of indigenous life
form, presumably carbon-based, to generate it. Alien life would
excite and stimulate us intellectually, but presents colonists with problems. It may generate prions and allergens
and other toxins deadly to humans, or to the Earthly creatures we
bring. It probably will not be biologically simpatico with
terrestrial organisms, products as we are of several billion
years of separate evolution under an alien sun, so we will have to
replace it with our own imported species, which raises serious ethical
questions. If somehow we find alien species which we could safely eat
or exploit, they may not want to coexist peacefully – they may want
to eat us, and may become quite good at it, as Robert Wilson posited in
one of my favorite SF novels.
Building settlements on a lifeless
alien world, or terraforming a near-Earthlike one, comprise possible
alternatives, but more expensive ones than colonizing a planet with free
air and water. Of course such worlds already exist relatively nearby, in our own Solar
System.
The question with which I started this
series is “Will humans colonize the galaxy?” and while I
obviously can't provide a definite answer, I still don't think we
will have a motive to do so. Finding a single extrasolar biosphere
haven for humans and dolphins and penguins and brine shrimp and
other Earthly creatures is a worthy and even necessary goal, and in
the longer term we will probably need two or three of them as extinction
insurance. I don't think we'll need a galaxy full of them, and
since we'll have to travel a long distance and spend a lot of
resources to find and colonize a suitable New Earth, limited need and high expense
will keep the number of them small.
No comments:
Post a Comment