The extended Nerd-o-sphere received an extra-large dose of trauma for New Year's, with the publication of Vulture's expose on Neil Gaiman, Dark Lord of modern fantasy. I won't recount here the more lurid details of Lila Shapiro's essay, except to say that we probably now have a good blow-by-blow of how the Headmaster's father (in Sandman No. 25) was abusing his wife. I was also struck by how Shapiro's real-life account of sexual abuse and assault helps answer another question: what happens to a child raised in a vicious religious cult when he grows up and becomes rich and famous?
Young Neil was the prince-in-waiting of the British branch of Scientology, a sci-fi-inflected cult founded by American pulp writer L. Ron Hubbard. The Scientologists were known for their ritual humiliation and torture of rule-breakers: physical isolation,degrading work details, attempted drowning. Gaiman, whose parents were very high-ranking officials in the Church, almost certainly knew of these practices, especially because he was himself a victim: his father attempted to drown him in the bathtub. Physical and psychological mortification became normal parts of his childhood, and it is easy to see how Gaiman incorporated them into his adult private life.
Describing young Mr. G. as a "prince" underscores a second germane aspect of his upbringing: privilege. In his youth Gaiman was allowed to work for the Church of Scientology as an auditor, an unusual grant of authority to a teenager. He took elocution lessons to let him blend more easily into Britain's upper-middle class. He recalls that when he left home he was determined to conquer the world, and his considerable talents allowed him to do just that. Many publications, awards and TV shows later, Gaiman now enjoys more widely-useful privileges: he is a one-percenter, owns three houses on three continents, and is friends with Jeff Bezos. Now that he is rich and famous, he appearss determined to enjoy his droits de seigneur. If one believes Gaiman's accusers - as I do - he is more than willing to throw his economic weight around when women won't comply with his more repugnant demands. And for all his erudition, Gaiman doesn't seem to recognize the word "No."
Alexander Burgess asks Morpheus to sign an NDA.
I don't think Neil Gaiman will suffer any legal consequences for his misconduct - not in a world where the law harrows the weak and shields the strong. I cannot imagine, however, that his fans will ever forgive him, and I suspect his revenue stream is about to become a lot narrower. Over the last twenty years Gaiman has made Neil Himself his principal product. Fewer people will now want to listen to his self-narrated audiobooks or attend his speaking engagements, because Gaiman has become a larger story than any fictional tale he may wish to tell. That story is large and loud and drearily familiar: "Famous fantasy and scifi author is actually a masher/pedophile/child abuser/child molester/serial rapist."* No one really wants to hear it again. "Victims of famous SFF author get some justice and closure" - that's the only narrative most of us in Nerdland now want to hear.
* Gaiman is the last name on this list; the others are Isaac Asimov, Arthur Clarke, David Eddings, and Marion Bradley.